The Next Best Thing

To Being There

    Saturday, December 19, 2009

     

    Get It by Dec. 24 - 1 day left to order with Standard Shipping

    So says amazon.com. You know what this means?

    That's right, it's Liminal Suggestion #3!

    If your last-minute scramble to buy Christmas presents has been thwarted by the snow, then online shopping is the way to go.

    This picture was taken in June when I (once again desperately in need of a comb) read at RJ Julia Independent Booksellers in Madison, CT, from my new book FROM SQUARE ONE: A MEDITATION, WITH DIGRESSIONS, FROM CROSSWORDS.

    You can order from Amazon by clicking here.

    And if you click on the link you'll see this review from gerryb of Cambridge, MA (another stranger, I promise): "I loved the amazing information so fluidly presented- a fascinating history of crosswords and the gossip, recollections and stories of puzzlers both famous and unknown. I loved finding out that Meg Wolitzer, author of one of my favorite novels ('The Wife') is a serious crossword person."

    One last thing: remember how valuable it is if you recommend this book to others who are also having a hard time thinking of the perfect gift.

    Thank you,
    Dean

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 6:43 PM 0 comments

    Friday, December 04, 2009

     

    Time and Space Defied Once Again

    We humans get accustomed to new realities so quickly, it can be frightening sometimes.

    I was thinking about this during the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin wall. Here was this thing that had defined our lives for decades after World War Two. I spent my junior year in France convinced I'd be incinerated by a nuclear bomb. And then, suddenly, the defining reality was gone literally overnight.

    And within a couple of days we already became accustomed to our new life we were living utterly devoid of fear.

    Every once in a while I am reminded of what a sea change has taken place in the very, very recent past. Here is the interview I did on Thursday, December 3, with Ellen Rocco and Chris Robinson, for the program Readers & Writers on North Country Public Radio. An interview that was conducted live on local radio - in other words, at a specific time in a specific place.


               


    And now, barring disaster, anyone can listen to it at any time, wherever they want on the planet.

    Labels: crossword, from square one, radio

    posted by DO at 10:24 PM 0 comments

     

    Liminal Suggestion: 21 Shopping Days Left


    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 6:55 AM 0 comments

    Wednesday, December 02, 2009

     

    I'll Be on the Radio - Where the Winds Hit Heavy on the Borderline

    I'm looking forward to being back on the air again at North Country Public Radio. The Next Big Thing enjoyed a happy home on this sweet little (big, actually!) network of stations in upstate New York. I'll be interviewed about FROM SQUARE ONE on the book show Readers & Writers Thursday, December 3, from 7 to 8pm. NCPR's live stream can be heard from anywhere on Earth by clicking here.

    Of course now I can't get this out of my head:




    Labels: crossword, from square one, radio

    posted by DO at 8:30 PM 0 comments

    Monday, November 30, 2009

     

    Cyber WEEK?

    Yes, according to an email from PayPal.

    Who knew?

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 5:40 PM 0 comments

    Sunday, November 29, 2009

     

    CyberMonday Is Upon Us

    If you are starting to shop for holiday gifts, I hope you’ll keep in mind my new book, FROM SQUARE ONE: A MEDITATION, WITH DIGRESSIONS, ON CROSSWORDS.

    It’s an obvious gift for crossword lovers, but it was written to interest a general audience.

    If you plan to buy it or have done so already, thank you. Even better would be if you recommended it to others who might be shopping for gifts.

    Barbra Tarkenton of Simsbury, Connecticut (a stranger, I promise) gave it five out of five stars and wrote the following review on Amazon:

    "I loved this book. What's wonderful about it is the way it seamlessly blends autobiographical details with a solid, well-reported appreciation of crossword puzzles. Yes, you learn about how avid British crossword puzzlers were recruited to help solve the Enigma code during WWII, and yes, you learn what the editors of crossword puzzles think makes a good puzzle ('fresh fill'), but what really lasts in the reader's mind are the scenes between the author and his father. (And also the story of a couple wherein the husband wakes up early to do the puzzle, and then erases all his answers so his wife can do it.) This book is literary in the best sense of the word."

    To buy the book from Amazon, you can click here.

    Barnes & Noble has a special CyberMonday deal going. To buy from B&N, you can click here.

    And don’t forget Powell’s, the wonderful independent bookstore in Portland, Oregon, which sells online here.

    Thank you. And remember: it would mean so much if you suggested the book to your friends who are buying gifts, too.

    Happy CyberMonday,
    Dean

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 8:52 PM 0 comments

    Saturday, October 10, 2009

     

    Friendly Reminder

    My appearance today at Wordstock has been moved to the Wieden + Kennedy stage. Showtime is still 1pm PT.

    Labels: crossword, portland

    posted by DO at 11:25 AM 0 comments

    Thursday, October 08, 2009

     

    Maybe There Are Too Many Books in the World

    Exhibit A:


    The idea of a bookstore that takes up a whole city block is superlative. The reality of it is so overwhelming that the world overwhelming just doesn't cut it.


    But, if you know the needle is in the haystack ...


    ... you make the effort, and search.


    But really. If Dan Brown can't turn things around, who can?

    Labels: crossword, from square one, portland

    posted by DO at 11:49 PM 0 comments

    Wednesday, October 07, 2009

     

    Wordstock Update

    I will still be at Wordstock in Portland, Oregon, this Saturday at 1pm. But I will be on a different stage: Wieden + Kennedy. It's a place where I can make more noise. (Me, making a big noise? Go figure.) Anyway, I do hope that if you have friends in Portland that you'll steer them toward the show.

    Thank you and good night.

    Labels: crossword, from square one, portland

    posted by DO at 9:26 PM 0 comments

    Saturday, October 03, 2009

     

    Invite Everyone You Know in the Pacific Northwest (Please)

    I'll be performing FROM SQUARE ONE: THE LIVE SHOW one week from today at the Wordstock Festival in Portland, Oregon. That's October 10, at 1pm PT on the Powell's Books Stage. James Ellroy will follow me on the same stage, but I'll be on opposite Joyce Maynard. You're going to have to choose between me and her.

    Update: I'll be on the Wieden + Kennedy stage - still at the same time, which is 1pm.

    Labels: crossword, from square one, portland

    posted by DO at 12:14 AM 0 comments

    Sunday, September 20, 2009

     

    This Is Hilarious

    It is, however, not intended as a joke.

    (I wonder what happens if you listen to Mozart while solving a Kafka-themed crossword.)

    Click here: < http://bit.ly/7Lsgo >

    Labels: crossword, music

    posted by DO at 8:35 AM 0 comments

    Monday, August 17, 2009

     

    Live, from Labastide-Esparbairenque, France, It's Tuesday Morning!

    In other words, thanks to Skype, I'll be appearing on blogtalkradio (http://bit.ly/1EfsMt) at 9am ET.

    Labels: crossword, from square one, radio

    posted by DO at 4:44 PM 0 comments

    Wednesday, August 12, 2009

     

    Nel mezzo del cammin

    I’m midway through a writer’s retreat in southern France, at La Muse -- about a half hour north of Carcassonne. Under normal circumstances, home would feel a world away, but of course that is no longer the case thanks to << les internets >>. While here I was gratified to read a review on Goodreads that captured, in a single sentence, what I was trying to do in FROM SQUARE ONE. As Phillip points out, I wrote the book to “mimic the feel and philosophy of a crossword puzzle.” I believe he is the first to notice.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 1:22 PM 1 comments

    Thursday, August 06, 2009

     

    From the Evanston Public Library

    http://bit.ly/xnXEW

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 10:13 AM 0 comments

    Wednesday, August 05, 2009

     

    A Reader Writes

    A review of FROM SQUARE ONE, by the blogger Morningstar.

    http://inallweathers.blogspot.com/2009/08/square-one.html

    In case you were wondering, the source quote for the blog title is by James Russell Lowell: “The only faith that wears well and holds its color in all weathers, is that which is woven of conviction and set with the sharp mordant of experience.”

    As for the origin of morningstar as a single word, I’m afraid you’re on your own.

    [Correction: I got that one all wrong. Although Bartleby provided me with the Lowell citation above, Morningstar posts the source of the quote right on her blog. I just wasn't paying attention. Anyway, here's what she had in mind: “He that loves a book will never want a faithful friend, a wholesome counselor, a cheerful companion, an effectual comforter. By study, by reading, by thinking, one may innocently divert and pleasantly entertain himself, as in all weathers, as in all fortunes.” -Barrow]

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 10:05 AM 0 comments

    Sunday, July 26, 2009

     

    The Favorite Clue Project

    What's your favorite crossword clue? Please leave it in the comments below. I want to know why you like it and also any interesting story that may go along.

    In the interest of full disclosure, my ulterior motive has to do with the further development of FROM SQUARE ONE: THE LIVE SHOW.

    No promises. Hey, that's show biz.

    P.S. Please sign in using your email, or at least leave some way that you can be contacted.

    Thanks!

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 1:47 PM 8 comments

     

    First the Good News

    While newspapers and magazines elsewhere are cutting back on crosswords, the Harrisburg Patriot-News is adding more puzzles to the paper.

    Now the bad: they're adding sudoku and KenKen®.

    I'm quoted in the article and, FYI: I do not say "play crosswords."

    Labels: crossword, from square one, journalism

    posted by DO at 9:20 AM 0 comments

    Saturday, July 25, 2009

     

    Where Did He Go?

    Hi. Sorry. It's been a busy week. On Wednesday, there was the debut of FROM SQUARE ONE: THE LIVE SHOW at Union Hall in Brooklyn. Hoping to have video of that up on the site very soon.

    And then Amy Reynaldo, who I think of as the Pauline Kael of crosswords, asked me to sit in the big chair over at Diary of a Crossword Fiend and serve as guest blogger while she took a desperately deserved day off. And let me tell you, where she has set the bar, blogging is hard work!

    Click here for my post.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 11:17 PM 0 comments

    Sunday, July 19, 2009

     

    W(h)ither Crosswords?

    Anne Trubek, writing for Good magazine online, asks if crosswords are destined to go the way of the newspaper. (Along the way she mentions my skepticism about the ability of crosswords to protect us from dementia.) I think her question is worth asking. Her post has prompted more than 70 comments and counting, many in vehement disagreement.

    Labels: crossword, from square one, journalism

    posted by DO at 11:22 AM 0 comments

    Friday, July 17, 2009

     

    Please Do Not Steal This Book

    A reader from Canada writes: http://bit.ly/4a1lnN

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 10:10 AM 0 comments

     

    Two for Two

    Once again, minutes before the scheduled start of a bookstore event, violent weather strikes. I am trying not to take it personally.

    The first time it happened, at RJ Julia in Madison, CT, turnout was slim - there was a tornado warning, for Pete's sake! - and I do not have a local circle of friends in that area.

    Last night, however, playing for the home crowd, not only friends but total strangers packed the Lenox Bookstore. The interview on WAMC's Roundtable seemed to do the trick.

    While at the Bookstore, I learned from proprietor Matt Tannenbaum about this review of FROM SQUARE ONE, in the Kenyon Review.

    On to Brooklyn!

    Labels: crossword, from square one, radio

    posted by DO at 8:18 AM 0 comments

    Wednesday, July 15, 2009

     

    From the Roundtable Today on WAMC

    I was interviewed by Ian Pickus, who gave me lots of room to give a sense of what I tried to do in the book.

    Here's one clip.

    Here's another.

    And yet another.

    By the way, there's an update to report since the interview was taped. The Atlantic apparently has not read my book and has announced it will no longer run Cox & Rathvon's outstanding Puzzler, even online. You can read the Times story here.

    Labels: crossword, from square one, radio

    posted by DO at 11:32 AM 0 comments

    Thursday, July 09, 2009

     

    Favorite Indie Bookstores, Part Two

    The Bookstore in Lenox, Massachusetts, where I'll give a reading on July 16 at 7pm.


    This is Matt, the proprietor. He cracks me up.


    And this is Jim, a talented artist and customer, not only of the Bookstore but also the Coffee Shop around the corner.


    When I was writing the book, I would see Jim and Matt at the Coffee Shop an awful lot. (I never noticed all the generic business names in Lenox. Maybe they should rename it Town.)

    Anyway, if you'll be at all nearby on the sixteenth, please come. Matt promises refreshments, and I promise more than just a reading. I'll be there with my sound gear to present an excerpt from the live show the following week at Union Hall in Brooklyn.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 6:12 AM 0 comments

    Wednesday, July 08, 2009

     

    FROM SQUARE ONE: THE LIVE SHOW

    will make its debut two weeks from tonight, at Union Hall in Park Slope. It consists of me sitting on stage and performing material drawn from the book, with original music and sound design. Think Laurie Anderson, Spalding Gray, Anna Deveare Smith - that end of the continuum.

    Click here to find out more about Union Hall. Click here to get a better idea of the spoken-word edition of FROM SQUARE ONE. Most important, click your heels together and come to the show:

    Wednesday, July 22 at 7:30pm
    Union Hall
    702 Union St. at 5th Ave.
    Brooklyn, NY
    $10 at door

    Hope to see you there!

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 8:26 AM 4 comments

    Tuesday, July 07, 2009

     

    Lenox Bookstore, Here I Come

    July 16 at 7pm
    The Bookstore in Lenox, Massachusetts
    Click here for more info.

    It's going to be an enhanced book reading, with the addition of sound design and original music - an abbreviated version of FROM SQUARE ONE: THE LIVE SHOW, which will make its debut very soon. Watch this space.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 10:07 AM 0 comments

    Wednesday, July 01, 2009

     

    Can't Let Go

    When I was working on FROM SQUARE ONE, I asked a writer friend how I would know when it was finished. She explained that books are never finished. They are taken from you.

    Sure enough, now that the book is out there, I'm starting to hear all kinds of remarkable crossword tales that I wish I had known about before I handed in the manuscript - so many that I'm now thinking about the book's afterlife, as a live show. (More on that later.)

    In any event, with such a future in mind, I am using this space now to collect your crossword tales. Feel free to write them in the comments or, better yet, email them to me.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 2:31 PM 1 comments

    Tuesday, June 30, 2009

     

    The Anxiety of Influence

    The first question after my reading last week at the Upper West Side Barnes & Noble was, "What books shaped the writing of From Square One?"

    I acknowledged the following:

    Robert Pirsig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
    M.F.K. Fisher, How to Cook a Wolf
    Kurt Vonnegut, Slaughterhouse-Five
    Sarah Vowell, Radio On
    Edward Burton, The Anatomy of Melancholy

    The last one is a little eccentric, since I've never actually read it. But based on what I know of it, I think it's a direct antecedent.

    I'll find out soon because it has gone to the top of my summer reading list.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 12:37 AM 0 comments

    Monday, June 29, 2009

     

    Radio Radio

    On Tuesday, June 30, I'll appear on New Hampshire Public Radio talk show Word of Mouth, which is hosted by the lovely and amazing Virginia Prescott. The segment is scheduled from 12:43 to 12:51pm ET. This is not a typo.

    Then, the next day (July 1) I'll be on for a whole hour, taking calls and everything, on WHYY's outstanding Radio Times. That's from 11am to 12 noon ET.

    For updates about future appearances on air, watch this space.

    Labels: crossword, from square one, radio

    posted by DO at 3:13 PM 0 comments

    Saturday, June 27, 2009

     

    A Grid

    The window of one of my favorite independent book shops: Three Lives & Co., on the corner of West Tenth Street and Waverly Place in New York City's Greenwich Village.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 2:46 PM 0 comments

    Wednesday, June 24, 2009

     

    One More Thing

    The spoken-word version of FROM SQUARE ONE was released yesterday by Random House Audio.

    It is not a conventional audiobook, i.e., a verbatim reading of the text over the course of eight hours. It is not a replacement experience for the book.

    Instead, imagine a monologue with sound design and original music, 70 minutes long, a little in the tradition of Laurie Anderson. Here's a sample:


    It's a download only, available from iTunes, eMusic, Simply Audiobooks, and Audible.

    Thank you for listening.

    Labels: audiobook, crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 10:33 AM 0 comments

    Tuesday, June 23, 2009

     

    On the Radio

    Today:

    The Leonard Lopate Show, 12:40-1pm ET

    Then, in the evening (News willing), an interview with Melissa Block on All Things Considered

    [updated update: These things are always highly subject to change, even at the last second, but the All Things Considered interview is now scheduled for today at 4:20pm ET - and every two hours thereafter.]

    Labels: crossword, from square one, radio

    posted by DO at 12:05 AM 3 comments

     

    “Hooray! Hooray! Hooray! Hooray!"

    “The Cross Word Puzzle Book is out today.”
    —columnist F.P.A. in 1924, greeting the first title published by Simon and Schuster

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 12:00 AM 0 comments

    Monday, June 22, 2009

     

    Tomorrow









    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 2:46 PM 0 comments

    Saturday, June 20, 2009

     

    If This Doesn't Draw the "True Blood" Crowd, Nothing Will

    From the New York Daily News:

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 11:50 AM 1 comments

    Friday, June 19, 2009

     

    Rex Parker Does FROM SQUARE ONE

    To read his review, please click here.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 3:01 PM 0 comments

     

    On Shelves Now


    In the sports section, apparently.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 11:40 AM 1 comments

    Thursday, June 18, 2009

     

    "I Don't Buy It"

    The idea that crosswords offer protection against Alzheimer's. I just don't buy it. It came up during the interview on the Faith Middleton Show (WNPR in Connecticut) this week. Click here for that clip and click here for the entire episode.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 10:13 PM 0 comments

    Wednesday, June 17, 2009

     

    More or Less the Opposite of What I Would Have Expected

    Amazon.com now lists the hardcover FROM SQUARE ONE as in stock. However, if you want to buy the Kindle Edition, you must wait until the official publication date, which is June 23.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 8:48 PM 0 comments

    Tuesday, June 16, 2009

     

    Back Where I Came From

    I jumped from commercial to public radio 25 years ago when I took a job as a board operator in Hartford, Connecticut. The station's star interviewer then was Faith Middleton. She still is. Yesterday Faith did an interview with me, and it's scheduled to air today. Of course, you never know with these things - there's always the possibility of being bumped to a later date. This link will take you to her show.

    Labels: crossword, from square one, radio

    posted by DO at 10:50 AM 0 comments

    Monday, June 15, 2009

     

    They're HEEeeere!

    The official publication date isn't for another week, but according to customer service at barnesandnoble.com, there are copies of FROM SQUARE ONE in stock in at least two warehouses. And, as you'll find out if you click through, this is your LAST CHANCE for Fast and Free Delivery by Father's Day.

    Barnes & Noble will also host my first reading, on the official date, at their location on Broadway at 82nd Street. That's June 23 at 7PM. Click here for details.

    More soon. Watch this space.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 5:26 PM 1 comments

    Saturday, June 13, 2009

     

    From My Editor's Shelf

    These are a few of the titles my editor is shepherding to print:

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 8:26 AM 1 comments

    Friday, June 12, 2009

     

    Finally, the Other Shoe

    As always, it drops more quietly than the first one.

    I'm talking about the refutation of sensational news. The startling claim gets everyone's attention; the sober follow-up does not.

    This is consistent with the man-bites-dog nature of journalism. But what's unfortunate is that it allows misleading information to get encoded in our culture as fact.

    For that reason I wish to draw your attention to this post from the New Old Age blog at nytimes.com. It's very much in sync with an argument I make in FROM SQUARE ONE, where I pick apart claims that crosswords help you to keep your marbles.

    The book should be on shelves any minute now. Maybe even in time for Father's Day. Official publication date is June 23.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 6:13 PM 0 comments

    Wednesday, June 10, 2009

     

    Grids



    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 10:32 PM 0 comments

    Saturday, May 30, 2009

     

    Confession

    I have not done a Sunday Times crossword in years. It simply requires too much effort for too little payoff.

    The decision is made all the easier by the appearance every Sunday of a variety puzzle on the bottom of the page. Too infrequently – every six weeks or so – the Times runs a diagramless crossword in that space. These are quite fun, if only because they're a little like being dropped into the jungle and having only a compass, and no map, to find your way out.

    The clues in a diagramless tend typically to be somewhat easy, since it would be unfair to make you come up with answers and figure out the grid all by yourself. This weekend, though, the Times prints a diagramless with more challenging (and rewarding) clues than you normally get. And it was made by Francis Heaney, leading player in From Square One, which will make its way onto shelves any day now.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 9:41 AM 1 comments

    Saturday, May 02, 2009

     

    The Calm Before the Calm

    I haven't verified the quote, but that is what Dawn Powell is supposed to have called this period of waiting for your book to be published.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 8:58 PM 1 comments

    Friday, May 01, 2009

     

    Today Is Buy Indie Day

    Toby Cox, proprietor
    Three Lives & Company
    Booksellers

    To mark the occasion:
    The Song Is You, by Arthur Phillips
    purchased by me as the doors opened at 11am
    Three Lives & Company
    154 West Tenth Street
    New York, NY 10014
    212-741-2069

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 11:20 AM 0 comments

    Thursday, March 05, 2009

     

    Slightly Startling . . .

    . . . since the conclusion of this study directly relates to the climax of my book, which is in production and comes out in the next few months.

    You're right. The book is about crossword puzzles. What do music and autism have to do with a book about crosswords?

    You're going to have to stay tuned for the answer to that one. Or maybe buy the book.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 7:49 PM 0 comments

    Saturday, February 14, 2009

     

    As Far as I Know, My Ancestors Are from Lvov

    Which might help to explain this.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 4:19 PM 2 comments

    Friday, August 04, 2006

     

    Heh heh

    He said 45 Across.

    Heh.

    Labels: crossword, new york times

    posted by DO at 9:11 AM 10 comments

    Saturday, July 29, 2006

     

    "What an Amazing Language"

    The speaker: My mother, on the couch, sometime during the last 25-30 years, having an aha moment over a particularly clever piece of crossword misdirection.

    My thought: Really? Is English really more amazing than other languages when it comes to ambiguity and wordplay? I just don't know.

    Today in the Times: "Number of people" (48 Across, ten letters).

    My thought: What an amazing language.

    Labels: crossword, language, new york times

    posted by DO at 12:01 PM 11 comments

    Saturday, July 15, 2006

     

    Speaking of Unintended Naughtiness

    "Old-fashioned contraction" (85 Across in the Sunday Times puzzle)?

    Not so old-fashioned anymore.

    "Manly, yes, but I like it, too."

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 11:01 PM 3 comments

    Friday, July 14, 2006

     

    Will You Look at That?

    Just as I was wondering about why we hold on to these standards of gentility from yesteryear, lo and behold I discover, in this week’s prize, a quotation from a letter Margaret Farrar wrote to 16-year-old novice constructor Merl Reagle: “Crosswords are an entertainment. Avoid things like death, disease, war and taxes—the subway solver gets enough of that in the rest of the paper.”

    Thanks to those of you who argued with me about whether we ought to hold on to these Farrar-era mores. I was also curious to find out more about Ruby’s thoughts on the flow state, but in my attempts to contact her directly I keep hitting that brick wall otherwise known as mathbats.com.

    And now for the winner.

    First off, all of you who see naughtiness where it’s unintended (ahem, Orange) are disqualified. As punishment, there will be no third place.

    Coming in second is Todd McClary, who provided a good list of political incorrectitude and also interesting reflections on the subject.

    First place goes to the most outrageous entry submitted. This may be a little unfair, since Ben Tausig is in the business of pushing the envelope. However, I only specified that the puzzle had to be published in a newspaper and never said anything about whether said paper was intended for a family audience. My bad. Therefore this week’s contest winner is tom mc. Please reveal your whereabouts to me so that I might send out your prize.

    And thank you all for playing.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 2:48 PM 5 comments

    Tuesday, July 11, 2006

     

    Really?

    Is this as racy as it gets? I guess maybe crosswords really are toeing the line more than I wanted to admit. I'm curious to know how much solvers actually embrace this insistence on gentility, which I presume goes back to the Margaret Farrar days. I like to think I'd prefer a crossword to reflect everything that appears in the paper—the good, the bad and the ugly. Something provocative. There are days when the notion of a crossword as an oasis free of unpleasantness seems played out.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 9:46 AM 5 comments

    Monday, July 10, 2006

     

    Well?

    What, is this a family-friendly crowd or something?

    If that's the case, then you'll really hate this.

    In the meantime, get on it.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 1:20 PM 0 comments

    Saturday, July 08, 2006

     

    Speaking of QUICKIES (18 Across)

    It’s time for another contest!

    This spring, we started noticing naughtiness in the grids. Leaving aside the matter of SCUMBAGs, in recent months we've had to acknowledge that SPERM BANKs exist, and don’t forget Byron’s B CUP.

    You can guess where this is headed. This week’s contest: Crossword Answers That Raised At Least One Eyebrow. Banned Crosswords don’t count. Entries must have appeared in mainstream puzzles only (i.e., they must have been published in newspapers).

    The deadline is Thursday, July 13 at 5pm ET. First prize goes to the most risqué entry. The winner gets Matt Gaffney’s new book Gridlock: Crossword Puzzles and the Mad Geniuses Who Create Them.

    Good luck!

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 12:35 PM 10 comments

    Thursday, July 06, 2006

     

    And Now, the Oscar for Crossword Fame That Just Won't Die

    Well. Here we are. Another contest.

    In third place we have Ruby, for her meditation on fame which, as she admits herself, has little to do with the question, but The Next Best Thing rewards risk-taking.

    In second place: Anonymous John. My personal hunch is that he hit three of the current top ten when he asked: "YMA Sumac? EMO Philips? EERO Saarinen? Is that the sort of name you're looking for?" But then we must remember that this contest is scored not only by raw numbers but by attempts at narrative.

    Which brings us back to Ruby, who is right: OONA is the winner. Not because I've actually checked to find out if EERO might be more common than OONA. I'd like to, but the fact is every time I try to register at Cruciverb.com, it rejects me (and I don't handle rejection well at all). Plus, I figure several people would be quick to find out the data for me.

    And so, without further ado (too much ado, anyway), it's time to award first prize. It goes to Aimless, who not only fingered OONA but also painted a domestic tableau involving ERNO, ASTA and FALA. (Aimless, please email me your mailing address so I can send out your book.)

    Just a little more ado before we go. In first place, we actually have a tie. (Technically, that means there should be no second place, but we're not doing it that way.) The fact is, Orange was first with OONA, although you might not know it because she jumped the gate and sent in her entries the previous week. I considered penalizing Orange not only for bringing poor Barbaro to mind (my leg's not that bad, though) but also for submitting "Peer Gynt's mother" ASE and then promptly forgetting she had done so ("Who is Ase again?"). I realized, though, she was probably engaging in dramatic irony and decided to cut her some slack.

    Congratulations to both of you!

    Here are the entries submitted.

    ALERO
    ARA Parseghian
    ASE
    ASTA
    ARN
    ARI Fleischer, Onassis
    DELLA Street (and yet no one mentioned her creator ERLE)
    Leon EDEL
    EERO Saarinen
    ELENA Verdugo*
    ELIA Kazan
    ELIAN Gonzalez
    ELLA Fitzgerald
    EMIL Zatopek, Jannings
    EMO Philips
    ENYA
    ERNO Rubik
    ERTE
    ESAI Moraeles
    ETTA James, Kett
    FALA
    ILKA Chase*
    ILENE
    Robert ILER
    INA Balin
    INGA Swenson
    IRENE Castle, Dunne et al
    NIA Vardalos
    OONA O'Neill
    Elisha OTIS
    Jack PAAR
    PIA Zadora, Lindstrom
    POLA NEGRI
    REBA McEntire
    REO
    THEDA BARA
    UNA Merkel
    UTA Hagen
    TIA Carrera
    YMA Sumac (and no one mentioned UMA)

    My guess is that these days, the most popular ones are probably ASTA, EERO, OONA and UTA. In the category of Once Overdone, Now Not So Much: UNA, YMA.

    *see comments

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 4:30 PM 9 comments

    Friday, June 30, 2006

     

    Stay of Execution

    As Francis notes, the deadline for this week's contest has passed; however, I could use a few more entries. Plus, I'm trying to move out and make way for the summer renters. And return to my fifth-floor walkup in New York. (Given the state of my right leg, there's probably no better incentive to finish writing the book.)

    Anyway, go ahead and keep sending in your examples of Words and Names That Would Otherwise Be Long Forgotten Were It Not for the Crossword Puzzle. The new deadline is Wednesday, July 5 at 5pm EDT.

    This way you can have the whole holiday weekend to think of good answers.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 12:34 PM 1 comments

    Wednesday, June 28, 2006

     

    Look at the Time

    Here it is, Wednesday already, and we barely have any entries for this week's contest: Words and Names That Would Otherwise Be Long Forgotten Were It Not for the Crossword Puzzle. Example from today's Times: REGIS.

    Just kidding. I meant OLAN. (Do people even know anymore who Pearl Buck is, for that matter?)

    Anyway, I know everyone's focused on my metamorphosis into a Transformer. Come on, people, concentrate! You have just a little more than one day left. And don't forget you have a better chance of winning the prize (Tough Crossword Puzzles from the Pages of the New York Times, vol. 13: 100 of the Most Challenging Puzzles) if you include an interesting story with your entry.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 1:21 PM 5 comments

    Monday, June 26, 2006

     

    St. Monday

    I've been requested to upload a picture of my foot on a daily basis.



    How this will help readers monitor my healing process is beyond me.

    As long as the Advil supply doesn't run out, the worst of it is the boredom. That's why it's especially important for everyone to send in entries to this week's contest: Words and Names That Would Otherwise Be Long Forgotten Were It Not for the Crossword Puzzle. Because I mean it, there's really nothing worth watching on TV.

    Take today's Times crossword, for example. Back in my day, EDSEL was still a useful shorthand for something that bombs spectactularly. Anymore? I don't think so, except in Puzzleland.

    Remember, you get extra points for entertaining me with your stories. To sweeten the pot, I would throw in an extra prize consisting of all this Vicodin I'm not taking, but I think the DEA would frown on that.

    Deadline is Thursday at 5pm my time.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 2:43 PM 5 comments

    Friday, June 23, 2006

     

    Please Hold Your Calls, We Have a Winner

    This was a tough one. Our contest received several very good entries.

    In third place we have Kostia, who submitted an excellent list of old favorites and whose observation about the primacy of vowels provides a terrific lead-in to our next contest (see below).

    In second place there's Lance Nathan, for the perfect ridiculousness of it: a clue and an answer, both of which are probably unknown to 99% of all solvers. I decided against awarding first prize because it's possible Lance described the only occurrence ever of this beautifully circular obscurity.

    First prize goes to Doug Peterson, whose added insight captures an essential aspect of the problem: with these words, we sometimes know the correct answer and yet have no idea what it means or why it's correct. It's a very specific and completely impractical kind of knowledge, useful only in crosswords.

    Doug, please email me your mailing address so that I can send you your prize. And thanks to everyone for playing.

    And now, on to our next contest, which is: Words and Names That Would Otherwise Be Long Forgotten Were It Not for the Crossword Puzzle.

    I realize there was time when people read novels by Leon Uris, but I think we can all agree that ARI's crossword fame has long outlived any name recognition in the real world. And I suppose spoon bender URI Geller still crops up in the news from time to time, but I would argue his notoriety within the grid is disproportionate to what he deserves. As Kostia points out, it's all about the vowels.

    So send 'em in: as many words as you can think of in this category. Extra points if you have an interesting (and true) story to tell.

    The drill's the same. Deadline is Thursday, June 29 at 5pm EDT. This time, the winner gets Tough Crossword Puzzles from the Pages of the New York Times (vol. 13): 100 of the Most Challenging Puzzles.

    Good luck!

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 11:21 AM 11 comments

    Thursday, June 22, 2006

     

    Tick Tock

    Don't forget the contest.

    Time's running out.

    You have until 5pm today.

    EDT.

    Do it.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 7:47 AM 1 comments

    Monday, June 19, 2006

     

    Don't Forget OLIO

    Today's Times (33 Down, "mishmash") features a word I can't imagine ever using in a sentence. And yet it was, for me, an early example of words I have only ever encountered in crossword puzzles. Maybe the first.

    Send in your examples of the same to compete in this week's contest. You may win a prize and even appear in the book.

    Oh, and don't forget that you get points for including an interesting story along with your entry.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 11:35 AM 0 comments

    Saturday, June 17, 2006

     

    And They're Off!

    Day two of the contest, and already many solid entries are coming in. Orange may be jumping the gun a little on next week's (Words and Names That Would Otherwise Be Long Forgotten Were It Not for the Crossword Puzzle), but that's okay. I'll allot the entries as appropriate. Oh, and be sure to tell your non-blog-frequenting friends to get in on the action. After all, there's a prize at stake.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 7:44 PM 0 comments

    Friday, June 16, 2006

     

    Step Right Up

    We've got prizes, prizes, prizes.

    Let's get a little action happening around here. It's true I'm not the most assiduous blogger, so please forgive me my occasionalness as I now try to rope you back in. That's why I'm resorting to the

    Lists, Lists and More Lists Contest

    That's right. The Next Best Thing wants to hear from you. Over the next few weeks, this space will be devoted to informal polls of reader favorites and pet peeves. We begin with:

    All I Really Need to Know I Learned From Crossword Puzzles

    The idea here is that every solver possesses a body of knowledge gleaned exclusively from puzzles. It's fair to say I might never have heard of "baseball great" Mel OTT were it not for his tendency to frequent the New York Times crossword.

    List as many examples as you can in the comments field. A prize goes to the person who has not only the most entertaining list of words but who can also tell an interesting story in connection with one or more of those words. Stories must be true. Editor permitting, you may end up in the book.

    Deadline is Thursday, June 22 at 5pm EDT. The winner (chosen by me) receives Emily Cox and Henry Rathvon's superb Mensa Cryptic Crosswords.

    Next Friday: Words and Names That Would Otherwise Be Long Forgotten Were It Not for the Crossword Puzzle.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 12:56 PM 14 comments

    Saturday, May 13, 2006

     

    What Separates the Men from the Oranges

    Well, this man, anyway.

    There have been Mondays when Amy finishes the Times crossword in two and a half minutes. It takes me twice as long. On Saturdays, she's done in five minutes. Today she smoked me by a factor of eight. When it comes to the American Crossword Puzzle Tournament, I came to terms long ago with the realization that I will never have the right stuff.

    I'm curious about the acrostics, though. Recently, Will Shortz said something about how it takes most solvers a lot longer to finish them. Really? I told him I'm usually done in about 15 minutes. It was hard to interpret the look on his face. I wondered if a.) I'm the fastest solver of acrostics in the country or b.) he thought I was lying.

    Today I timed myself to make sure I wasn't boasting unjustifiably, and sure enough, I was finished in 15 minutes. I wish there were a timed applet so that I could know how I stand up to the competition. If there were an American Acrostic Tournament, could I be a contender?

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 9:59 AM 8 comments

    Tuesday, April 25, 2006

     

    How Do the Judges Rule?

    [Devoted solvers, be on alert: I'm about to give away answers from today's New York Times crossword.]

    The theme unfolded just as it should. First came ELEMENTARY MY DEAR WATSON. When I then filled in PLAY IT AGAIN SAM, it started dawning on me. It was clinched with BEAM ME UP SCOTTY. Yes, we dealing with frequently misattributed film quotes here. But then came this final theme answer, the "surprise fact" about those three lines of dialogue: NONE OF THEM IS / A REAL QUOTE.

    And that's where it all fell apart.

    These are, in fact, real quotes. They're just spoken by different people from the ones we expect.

    It's true that the line PLAY IT AGAIN SAM is never uttered in Casablanca, but it is in A Night in Casablanca by the Marx Brothers. Of course, it's also the title of a movie starring Woody Allen, so it's definitely a "well-known line of film."

    The next one is most certainly a "well-known line of TV and film." Captain Kirk never said those words in that order on the TV show, but he did in Star Trek: The Motion Picture. And Captain Picard said it on TV (not that I would know any of this without looking it up).

    I'm also willing to bet the Sherlock Holmes line is actually said by someone somewhere in some movie, but it doesn't show up here, and it's too late/early for me to keep searching.

    Anyone? Anyone?

    Update: somebody's already on the case.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 2:08 AM 0 comments

    Tuesday, April 18, 2006

     

    I Might Be Pregnant

    If so, that would explain a lot.

    Twice in the last week I was asked, "When's your delivery?"

    (pause, confusion.)

    Oh, right, they mean the book.

    Labels: crossword, from square one

    posted by DO at 9:25 AM 1 comments

    Sunday, April 02, 2006

     

    Very Interesting

    And not at all stupid, either. Byron points out another crossword surprise. This one, not so much because it's racy (unless you subscribe to the folk etymology that SCUMBAG is a Shakespearean contraction similar to 'swounds) but rather because it violates the notion that crossword puzzles ought to be unpleasantness-free zones. Some constructors adhere quite strongly to this belief. Stanley Newman has even said he would rather not use ENRON because of its negative connotations. It makes me wonder, though: are we entering a new era of PG-13 puzzles, at least at the Times?

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 6:42 PM 4 comments

    Sunday, March 19, 2006

     

    Is It Me?

    ... or is the Times puzzle getting racier by the second? I went to see if SPERMBANK had ever made an appearance before, but I can't log into cruciverb.com. And then there's SCAG, a (previously unknown to me) slang term for heroin. Don't get me wrong. I'm not complaining. I, for one, feel the crossword universe is a little too sheltered and benefits from real-life intrusions.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 7:41 AM 3 comments

    Friday, March 17, 2006

     

    Upon Further Reflection

    It did seem a little harsh when yesterday's Times referred to PSYCHOLOGY as a "manipulative technique." If I had been paying closer attention, I'd have noticed that the puzzle actually required you to enter YGOLOHCYSP. In other words, reverse psychology. On the other hand, maybe my original interpretation wasn't so off after all.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 7:49 AM 0 comments

    Sunday, March 12, 2006

     

    Sex and Drugs Finally Make Their Way Into the Crossword

    Okay, it's a diagramless, so maybe different rules apply. But when's the last time you saw anything as racy as "High on drugs" (HOPPED UP) and "Bustier type, or maybe not?" (B CUP) in a Times puzzle?

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 7:17 PM 1 comments

    Wednesday, February 08, 2006

     

    This Is Not Working Out as I Had Hoped

    Turns out I won't have to move to Toronto after all. Those exquisite cryptics made by Emily Cox and Henry Rathvon for the National Post of Canada have been made available in book form. Mensa Cryptic Crosswords was published in October, and so, after waiting to see if anyone would make a holiday present of it (and leaving an extra month for the super-belated), I went ahead and ordered a copy.

    Here they are, 65 puzzles in all, their perfection marred only by what seems to be a computer-generated typographical error with the numbering on almost every page. (I'm not sure how that could have happened since I believe these books are proofread.) Oh, how I wish one of these puzzles appeared every day in the newspaper. Yes, I know, the New York Post prints a cryptic crossword every day, but those puzzles are British, and I don't speak that language. For these, all you need is to be able to pass as a Canadian, which is a useful skill anyway whenever you travel abroad these days. Pretend that you know the Montreal hockey team is known familiarly as the "Habs." In this universe, Atom Egoyan is simply a director—as opposed to a Canadian director.

    These puzzles originally appeared on a weekly basis in Canada. Theoretically, that should get me through 15 months. I'm off to a terrible start. In the week since the book arrived, I have already raced through the first seven. At this rate, they'll be done in early April. It's like asking someone to parcel out his stash of crack.

    Why do I love these Cox/Rathvon puzzles so much? Stan Newman, on his crossword cruise, put it this way: "Everything they do shines." That's true, but it's not the whole story. The variety cryptics they make for The Atlantic shine, too, but in my mind they are somehow diminished by their varietyness. (Rumor has it that the Atlantic puzzles are being banished to web-only status. I'm not terribly interested in turning The Next Best Thing into the Drudge Report for crosswords, so can anyone verify if this is true or false?) Anyway, something about these generic 15x15 grids lends them a Cartesian purity, but that's not the whole story, either, since the Times magazine occasionally runs similarly constructed non-variety puzzles by, say, Richard Silvestri, which I don't get to the same degree.

    In a time when every day hands us a new reason to stop loving our country as we once did, I find myself grasping at anything I can find to make this a better place to live. And so last year, at the Stamford tournament, I approached Henry Rathvon and told him how much I wished their cryptics appeared in the U.S. on a weekly basis. He looked at me if I had just spoken to him in Serbo-Croatian. After all, he's in this to make a living, and the perception exists that there will never be an appetite here for cryptic crosswords. Stan Newman reiterated the same thing on his cruise: "American newspapers will never embrace cryptics!" Of course, he also used to say the same thing about sudoku.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 9:23 PM 3 comments

    Tuesday, February 07, 2006

     

    It's Right There in the Dictionary

    Definition 4b.

    You don't need a background in physics or the law to know that without the force known as electromagnetism, wiretapping itself would be impossible.

    Note to AG: Do I have to do everything for you? Sheesh.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 12:02 PM 1 comments

    Tuesday, December 27, 2005

     

    Vote for Me

    If elected Crossword President, I vow to ban Roman numerals forever.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 10:54 AM 9 comments

    Sunday, December 25, 2005

     

    Christmas 2005

    I used to concoct excuses to return to college a few days before the semester started because I loved having the campus to myself and feeling like I owned the place. This morning I drove through the empty streets of Stockbridge—the same streets I've cursed on summer days, when crowds and traffic can slow things down so bad it's better to stay home rather than allot an extra hour just to get through town—and I wondered maybe things had gone too far. My wish had been granted and I wasn't happy about it. This was how Burgess Meredith felt when he broke his glasses on The Twilight Zone.

    Maybe it was a mistake to leave that city populated with so many non-Christian immigrants, where there is not only easy access to my favorite tradition of Chinese food and a movie but also the need to fend off the countless Gentiles who have become hip to the joys of Jewish Christmas.

    So a special holiday greeting goes out to the Elm St. market, which I avoid other days of the year because just inhaling the margarine on the grill brings on dark visions of clutching my chest and getting rushed to the emergency room. They were there for me on this most important of days, the fortnightly occasion when the Times publishes an Acrostic by Emily Cox & Henry Rathvon. Crosswords can be done on the computer as a last resort, but these gems require the magazine itself. And today's looks like it'll be a killer.

    Labels: berkshires, crossword

    posted by DO at 10:52 AM 3 comments

    Thursday, November 17, 2005

     

    Thank You, Amy!

    … for the most complete answer so far. Since Amy has declined the prize, it remains available. And what the hell, I’ll throw in my 2005 Edward Gorey calendar, too. I would, however, like to steer the conversation away from the question of how Will Shortz maintains the high quality of his puzzle and more in the direction of what exactly those qualities are. Answer #4 is starting to get at it. Those ineffable aspects I’m trying to grasp do include “the little humorous touches, tricky clues, and ‘aha’ moments,” but I think there’s more to it.

    For example, I’ve felt the need more and more to distinguish between aha! moments and ah! moments. Ah! moments, I think, have less to do with light bulbs over the head and more to do with appreciation of little moments of beauty. Once, when I was a teenager, I was solving a puzzle with my mother, and when we cracked a tricky clue playing off a word’s double meaning, she sighed in awe, “Isn’t English an amazing language?” I had never thought about it that way before. Is English more amazing than other languages? What produces the ah! moment?

    I also think it has something to do with the question of cultural references. For some reason—no doubt Will Shortz’s personal taste—the Times crossword speaks the same lingua franca as the countless (how many?) readers who are in it for the puzzle. Even the many clues, mostly sports-related, that mean nothing to me seem as if they ought to be there. The Times creates that feeling of reminding you of things you already know but just haven’t been foremost on your mind lately. Often, when doing puzzles in the Sun, which are nicely constructed and suitably challenging, I find myself wondering if I woke up in the wrong universe today.

    Labels: crossword, new york times

    posted by DO at 10:00 AM 7 comments

    Wednesday, November 16, 2005

     

    It's Come to This

    From the Department of Lame Prizes, to the commenter who offers the most satisfying answer to the question "What qualities make the New York Times crossword puzzle superior to all the others?": a 2006 MoMA members calendar, still shrink-wrapped and perfect for regifting.

    Labels: crossword, new york times

    posted by DO at 8:50 AM 2 comments

    Tuesday, November 15, 2005

     

    Day Two of “America Held Hostage”

    Rumor has it a press strike is keeping the Times from finding its rightful spot at Homer’s Variety (and the entire region, for that matter) two days in a row now. I am, of course, unable to verify this tip because I can’t buy the newspaper and there’s simply no other way to get the information. Can anyone out there tell me how else to find out?

    No, don’t. That was just a little joke for the benefit of those who still believe I don’t have this whole internets thing figured out yet.

    A helpful friend asks if doing the puzzle on newsprint is that much better than printing out the Across Lite file. [Note to those outside the tribe: Across Lite is the software that allows us to solve the crossword puzzle on a computer.] When I went on to explain that I have an irrational, costly, old-fashioned desire to possess the daily paper and complete the puzzle printed therein as God intended it, said friend came up with a truly brilliant solution: “Well, you could buy newsprint paper and print the puzzle on that and paste it over a puzzle in an old newspaper…”

    One quibble with “Beer festival mo.”=OCT. What about the fact that Oktoberfest is actually held in September? (I’ve always believed this is a by-product of the conversion from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar, although that theory suddenly seems a little suspicious, because that same calendrical conversion is the reason why the October Revolution is now commemorated in November. October either becomes September or November, but you can’t have it both ways, can you? Since the adoption of the Gregorian calendar required losing 13 days, I’m beginning to think that means it really can’t have anything to do with why Germans get drunk a month earlier than they’re supposed to. Okay, folks, this adds yet another question to the mix: what is the real reason for premature Oktoberfest? The need for instant gratification?)

    But really, the pressing question of the week remains unsatisfyingly answered: what qualities make the New York Times puzzle so superior? (Where’s Francis when you need him?) Don’t force me to resort to lame prizes. Here, let me prime the pump a little more. I think it has almost nothing to do with how hard they are, since the New York Sun puzzles are equally challenging, yet, to my taste, seem difficult for the sake of difficulty and tend to produce fewer Ah! experiences (as opposed to Aha! experiences).

    Labels: berkshires, crossword, new york times

    posted by DO at 1:49 PM 2 comments

    Monday, November 14, 2005

     

    The Next Best Thing Officially Goes Interactive. Have At It.

    Morning routine: en route to favorite coffee place where they use the steamed milk to draw fern leaves right into your latte, stop off at Homer’s Variety to pick up—what, no Times?

    Nice lady behind counter: “There’s only one distributor for the whole area. You’d have to go to Hartford to get one.”

    Can she tell by looking at my face that I’m considering doing just that?

    “It’s a Monday anyway. It’d be too easy.”

    I know, but you don’t understand. Just because it’s too easy doesn’t exempt me from having to do it.

    “You could go to the library and do it online.”

    No, that’s the thing. I already pay the $34.95 per year for the online puzzle, even though I prefer to solve it on newsprint. For that luxury I pay a dollar a day Monday through Saturday, plus $3.50 on Sundays, so that’s—WHAT?—$494 a year just for the fucking Times puzzle? Let’s see what the Berkshire Eagle has to offer.

    Oh right. This is why I shell out the dough.

    To be honest, I haven’t done enough crosswords syndicated by the Chicago Tribune to know if today’s is a representative sample or not, but this was just so—perfunctory.

    The single Ah! Moment (not to be confused with an Aha! moment) came with 43A: “Sink” or “swim” = VERB—although I'd like to think the Times would have had the courage to leave out the scare quotes.

    It makes you realize that constructing a good puzzle requires a whole lot more than just saying, “Oh look, here is a collection of words that fit together.”

    Which brings me to a question that has nagged me for a long time: just exactly what is it that makes the New York Times puzzle so superior? This is not a rhetorical question. I really want to know.

    Let me get you started by saying what I think is a small part of the answer: it’s smart, it’s fresh, and often has what people in the biz call “lively fill.” But is that all it takes to make a crossword good? Let me also say that, for me, anyway, it's rarely the theme that makes a puzzle satisfying. There's usually something else going on. Something mysterious. Tell me what it is.

    Labels: berkshires, crossword, new york times

    posted by DO at 9:39 AM 2 comments

    Sunday, November 06, 2005

     

    Now the Sun Will Rise as Brightly

    One of my least endearing qualities is a lack of compassion for people who claim they are “unable” to solve crossword puzzles. Oh come on, I say, it’s not that you can’t do it, you’re just not in the habit. Solving crosswords is a skill that, with practice, anyone can develop, just like exercise. Start with Mondays, and soon you’ll be complaining that the same words keep reappearing and that the work-to-fun ratio in the Sunday Times crossword is not favorable enough to merit spending time on it. Eventually, if you have the proper predisposition to addictive behavior, you’ll become, well, like me: before the news can be read and thoughts can be had and the work of the day carried out, the puzzle must be solved.

    As I do every Sunday, I opened the magazine from the back, bypassed the crossword at the top of the page and went directly to the diagramless below it. The wonderful thing about solving a diagramless puzzle is that it’s like parachuting into the desert without a compass and finding your way home, all at your kitchen table. It requires an inner sense of where you are, the mental equivalent of Bill Bradley’s ability to stand in the middle of the court and throw the basketball over his shoulder into the net behind him. Without looking. The diagramless, as the name implies, is a crossword with the black squares removed, thus leaving you on your own to figure out where to put them in. To make up for this added challenge, the clues are generally easier than they would be in a standard crossword. Once you get the hang of it, it can be a rather routine affair, but there is an elegant beauty in the way the answers ooze like blood from a stab wound, starting in the upper left corner and proceeding to the lower right. Every six weeks or so when the diagramless appears, I employ this same process so that I may begin my day.

    Today almost didn’t begin.

    1-Across: “Male turkeys.” I knew the answer would be four letters long, since the next clue was 5-Across. And that’s all I knew. For the life of me, I could not conjure up the answer. Male turkeys? Uh. Coqs? No. Under normal circumstances, filling in the downs would have solved the problem, but these were all stumpers. Was it possible that this puzzle, and therefore the whole day itself, would be stopped before it began? Because, given the aforementioned process I’ve followed year after year, without 1-Across, I wouldn’t be able to progress to the rest of the puzzle.

    After an hour or so of fidgeting and pacing and staring off into space, I suppose a normal person would have Googled, just to get the damn thing going. For some reason, though—and I don’t think it has anything to do with morality (although now that I reconsider, it might)—I won’t consult outside sources. Not that there’s anything wrong with people who do. That’s an individual choice they make for themselves. It’s just not for me. The problem is that it’s so difficult to know what you don’t know. It’s a matter of figuring out whether a.) you simply don’t know the answer, in which case checking a reference work might be permitted, or b.) the answer is in your brain but it’s just hidden under a pile of papers. Since the answer is almost the latter, then no looking up.

    Panic took over. I had things to do! Plus, I’m too young to go senile. Are those head injuries are starting to catch up with me? Is the government lying about mad cow disease in the food supply? Have I become one of those people with whom I have so consistently failed to empathize?

    Look at a problem head-on long enough and you fail. Turn your attention to the side, say, to a long, rambling phone conversation that still allows you enough CPU space for the unresolved problem at hand, and you stand a chance of hearing that teeny voice whispering from the medulla oblongata: “Dean, dear, you have become a rat in a Skinner box. Years of routine have inured you to the thrill of the challenge, the very thing that attracted you to these puzzles in the first place. Who says you have to start at 1-Across? Since the whole purpose of these diagramless crosswords is to navigate without a map, then get off your ass and start doing that. Start somewhere else in the puzzle, and then solve backwards to the beginning.”

    I thanked the voice, it muttered something that sounded like “dumbass,” and off I went. Within minutes, I wrote in T-O-M-S.

    And thus the day began. Just in time for dinner.

    Labels: crossword, new york times

    posted by DO at 7:42 PM 10 comments

    Friday, October 07, 2005

     

    This Is My Grandfather's Oldsmobile

    There is a rupture in the space-time continuum located precisely where the K-Mart stands in Great Barrington, Massachusetts. No matter what the calendar says, in that spot the year is always 1982. Anyone who enters is guaranteed to hear at least one song by Christopher Cross.

    I have discovered another entry point into that time warp: today’s Times crossword, which featured these hits from an even earlier yesteryear (several yesteryears, in fact):

    Parlor pieces = DIVANS

    Citrus-y drink = TOM COLLINS

    Nonconformists = BEATNIKS

    Bunk = APPLESAUCE (a double whammy, as both clue AND answer are long extinct)

    Emphatic negative = NOSIREEBOB

    Awesome = RAD (a noble effort at keeping up with the youth of today 1982)

    There's an important lesson to be learned here: maintaining a competitive edge in generational warfare requires more than just knowing what's new and hip (or, in the universe of this puzzle, hep). When it comes to crosswords, this war is fought on two fronts.

    Labels: crossword, new york times

    posted by DO at 7:07 PM 4 comments

    Friday, September 23, 2005

     

    Submitted With Humility (And a Fair Amount of Trepidation)

    Anyone who has witnessed the opening of the American Crossword Puzzle Tournament in Stamford knows that one points out errors in the Times crossword at one’s own risk. This past year, the festivities began on the very day the puzzle included a marvel of misdirection: 1D, “They got back on the road in 1998.” Before the end of the day, Will Shortz had already received a note from a reader expressing utter disdain. Everyone knew the Beatles had disbanded nearly three decades earlier. (I was reminded of Paul McCartney’s line that there would be no reunion as long as John Lennon remained dead.) Shortz was pitch-perfect as he captured the moral outrage of the letter—and then gently deflated it as he pointed out that the actual answer, BEETLES (as in Volkswagen), not BEATLES, was correct all along.

    I’ve learned to assume over the years that if I spot something that looks wrong, it’s a good idea to look a second, third and even a fourth time. Usually, I’m the one who’s just not seeing things the right way.

    This morning, when I encountered 52D, “‘As It Happens’ airer,” I didn’t think twice before entering CBC (all the while wondering if the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation has in fact been broadcasting its long-running interview program during the lockout that has crippled the network for the last six weeks). This, however, resulted in a suspicious CN combination in the crossing entry.

    Aha, I thought, Will Shortz and the constructor, Levi Denham, must be thinking of the broadcast entity that distributes the show south of the border. And indeed they were. They got the wrong one, though. While NPR (the answer in today’s puzzle) does air interesting news programs, it is American Public Media, a division of Minnesota Public Radio, that distributes “As It Happens” here in the States. Because NPR is the oldest and the most famous of the three major distributors of public radio programming in the U.S. (the other two being PRI and the aforementioned APM), it has become the Kleenex of its industry. And it’s natural to want National Public Radio and “national public radio” to be synonymous. But they’re not.

    Still, it was a very enjoyable puzzle.

    Labels: crossword, radio

    posted by DO at 9:13 AM 6 comments

    Friday, September 09, 2005

     

    He’s Ba-ack …

    … and none too soon. Something’s been missing over the last month and I haven’t been quite sure what—until this morning, when Six Things made its triumphant return to Heaneyland!

    Reason #1 why Six Things is the Best Cartoon Anywhere: as with a crossword puzzle (or a well-made piece of radio, for that matter), it is sooooooooo satisfying when a creator trusts the audience enough to allow the last part to come together in the end-user’s brain. It’s like handing you a head of Romaine, a few heirloom tomatoes and some finely shaved Pecorino and telling you, “Here, you make the salad yourself.” It always tastes better that way.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 11:28 AM 2 comments

    Saturday, September 03, 2005

     

    Unacceptable Indeed

    The plan was to tackle a particularly smart-looking puzzle, a crossword with a fresh twist in Friday’s New York Sun, which has been giving that other newspaper a run for its money lately. I was especially looking forward to it because it was by a constructor who once made a puzzle I had criticized, and here was an opportunity to follow up with praise for breathing life into an exercise that, over at the Times, can suffer from an inexorable sameness day after day.

    The plan was aborted. For the time being, anyway. I’ll come back to it at some point in the future, when focusing so much attention on a puzzle feels like the right thing to do. Time spent deep in Puzzleland, not bearing witness to the dead and the grieving, seems somehow disrespectful.

    Puzzleland, for those of us without developed spiritual practices who still need to cultivate a place in the mind apart from this world of betrayal and suffering, is the next best thing. In Puzzleland, there is no cancer, no hypocrisy, no government malfeasance. It is a clean and quiet virtual space where, instead of focusing on a single word, like om (which is out of the question anyway because it’s only two letters long), you open your thoughts to all the words in your memory. Laser-honed concentration silences hatred, injustice, and the voices that tell you you’re not good enough. And so, for a few moments every day, I acknowledge the many things in this world that I cannot change and make a trip to Puzzleland.

    Except for weeks like this one. Puzzleland is for garden-variety, everyday crimes and misdemeanors. The enormity of the wrongdoing this time around, resulting in the unnecessary loss of so many human lives and of an irreplaceable cultural patrimony, renders acceptance unacceptable. All human suffering is deplorable. But when it is so preventable, and when it so directly correlates to the actions of a government that consistently looks the other way, acceptance seems treasonous.

    I marvel how many times the American public accepts this same pattern as it is repeated again and again. After almost three thousand died in New York, while our leaders were looking the other way. And after even more innocent lives were lost in Iraq, allowing Osama bin Laden to escape capture while, once again, our leaders looked the other way. In parliamentary democracies, after such large-magnitude blunders, the government resigns in disgrace. It was nearly impossible to know what to say when the voters of this country, instead of demanding that Congress impeach the president for waging war under false pretenses, rewarded him with a second term of office.

    What’s a person of conscience to do? It is too late to spend the money on shoring up the levees. The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and that blood stains the hands of the administration that stopped paying for the efforts that might have prevented the annihilation of New Orleans while spending more and more on the debacle in Iraq instead. And while we as individuals send money for relief, we can’t help but worry whether those in charge have the competence to administer it.

    The precedent that was set in California seems more attractive by the day. But even a recall at the federal level would take too long. This president, who claims to cherish human life, seems hell-bent on destroying it at every opportunity. We must stop him before he kills again. I love America and I want its citizens to enjoy their right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The best thing we can do for the future of our country is to call upon the administration to step aside and make room for someone capable of doing the job.

    Labels: crossword, new york times, politics

    posted by DO at 2:42 PM 6 comments

    Sunday, August 28, 2005

     

    Sigh

    A post on the New York Times online crossword forum protests a particular clue (Musician whose unusual first name means “ocean child”) from Saturday’s puzzle “because it is arguably incorrect.” I should have paid closer attention to the “:)” that followed. Always giving the benefit of the doubt, I naturally assumed this was someone who was especially knowledgeable about Japanese names and who wanted to argue that “Yoko” was in fact quite common. I was set straight when someone else posted: “I don't know how she does it either, but she makes a living by uttering sounds that people pay to hear.”

    Labels: crossword, music, new york times

    posted by DO at 9:52 PM 10 comments

    Sunday, August 21, 2005

     

    Nice Guys Really Do Finish Last (And That’s Okay With Me)

    According to one theory, the human attraction to puzzles is a remnant from the days when the very survival of our species depended on keen problem-solving abilities. That may be, but I’m beginning to have my doubts, after the large chunk of yesterday I spent participating in The Haystack, a nine-hour competitive puzzle that uses the island of Manhattan as a playing board.

    It was remarkable on several counts. The puzzles were very well made, and the organizers made ingenious use of the city, sending us from Marcus Garvey Park in Harlem to the Columbia campus, Times Square, Battery Park City and finally Chinatown. Even more impressively, no one seems to make any money from it. The Haystack is fun for its own sake—highly organized, extremely taxing fun, for participants and organizers both. There was no admission fee, and the grand prize, the Golden Needle, was made from free parts acquired at a hardware store.

    My team, Unafraid, Laser-Honed Belfry Rejecter (I still have no idea how the name was derived, except that anagramming my name is what made us laser-honed), consisted of four longtime members of the National Puzzlers’ League—veteran solvers for whom puzzles are a way of life. Plus me. We were by no means the only team approaching middle age, yet it seemed as if most of the players were, like the organizers, significantly younger (in their 20s and 30s), naturally fun-loving, hip and consistently attractive. On the surface it was a handful of teams competing against each other, but at a deeper level it was us versus the beautiful people.

    Beautiful and crafty, I should add. Thanks to an element of the Haystack rules that was lost on our team, the key to winning ultimately had nothing to do with the ability to solve puzzles and had everything to do with strategic thinking. The path to victory was reserved for those solvers who knew which puzzles not to bother with, and, even more importantly, how to make use of Power Plays—sneaky tricks that, at their worst, could be used to force another team to swap its score with you.

    Unafraid, Laser-Honed Belfry Rejecter made the fatal error of ignoring these Power Plays and instead plowed into the task of solving as many puzzles as we could. We got off to a terrific start, and after the organizers announced this fact to the other teams, one of them used the information to dump their low score on us and to steal our high point total. At that moment we went from second place to, I’m guessing, last. It knocked the wind out of our sails, about a third of the way through the game, and we never recovered. Some of us took this rather hard, and one of my teammates really let one of the organizers have it. (sorry.)

    Then something happened that is very familiar to me. We grabbed the next round of puzzles and starting solving them with gusto, as if we knew there was no way we could compete in this arena—we’re puzzlers, after all, not cutthroat competitors—so why not just enjoy ourselves? I could almost feel our collective blood pressure drop.

    Solving puzzles is the most anxiety-reducing activity I know. But is it a vestige of the adaptation from when humans had to eat or be eaten? Given what happened yesterday, I’d be forced to argue just the opposite. It’s what got us eaten. There are people who talk about puzzles as if they were a kind of competition with oneself. Perhaps, but that’s not at all the same as competing against others. The two are opposites, really. Next year, I’ll propose to my teammates that we call ourselves the Ostriches and make a virtue of our tendency to plunge our heads into the sand, even as the Power Players make minced meat of us. I’m told ostrich burgers are quite tasty.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 4:59 PM 4 comments

    Monday, July 25, 2005

     

    No Dessert Until You Finish Your Vegetables

    Without rules, the basics in life would never get accomplished. I’ve had to institute this—let’s call it a guideline since, if it were a rule, I’d break it almost every day: no puzzle until you read the rest of the Times. Otherwise, I’d fail in my goal to be a well-informed citizen.

    Today, for example. Had I launched right in on solving the crossword, I’d be out of the loop on key stories: former Republican senator Fred Thompson is cleaving to the party line by arguing against the release of John Roberts’s official memoranda (“National Report,” p. A16); “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” continues to do better box office than “Wedding Crashers” and “Fantastic Four” (“Arts, Briefly,” p. E2); and Anita Askienazy knew not only one or two but THREE people on the 79th Street cross-town bus (“Metropolitan Diary,” p. B2).

    And now my reward. Too bad the crossword is as Lite as the rest of the paper, since Mondays are historically the slowest news day of the week. I understand the internal logic of making the puzzle progressively harder as the week goes on, but the news gets more voluminous, and substantive, over the course of the week, too. The net result is that there’s not enough time in the day to get through the Friday paper, and most Mondays it’s not worth buying the thing in the first place.

    There. I’ve finally found a strong rationale to buy the New York Post.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 10:32 AM 8 comments

    Saturday, July 16, 2005

     

    Gink Love

    It seems odd to me that when people want to understand a piece of art, they often begin by learning something about its creator’s biography. For some reason, I tend to forget that the works that mean so much to me—musical compositions in particular—result from a great deal of effort exerted by a living, human imagination. It’s as if they emanate on their own from the everlasting world of ideas.

    Will Shortz made it hard to hold on to this illusion when he started attaching bylines to the daily puzzles in the Times. Suddenly, the solver was faced with the various quirks of personality associated with this or that constructor.

    Knowing what I do about the author of today’s puzzle, I can’t help but wonder if the clues are meant to be read as a sort of autobiographical statement by wunderkind Michael Shteyman, who is just barely in his 20s and who has already contributed more than 25 puzzles to the Times. Shteyman immigrated to Baltimore from Saint Petersburg at the age of 12, graduated young from Johns Hopkins, is planning to become a doctor, and also plays the piano and composes. Was it a conscious choice to include “Language study topic” (TENSE), “Dictionary features” (USAGENOTES), “Not native” (ALIEN) and “Duma demurral” (NYET) all in the same themeless puzzle? And then there’s “Advanced missile feature” (HEATSENSOR), which, although less direct, does point to one of the facts of life that for years cast a shadow over both his home and adopted countries.

    Also, I have a feeling that having English as his second language is less a handicap and in some way a leg up. Think of his fellow Russian émigrés Vladimir Nabokov and Nicolas Slonimsky, who approached English with ears so unprejudiced they seemed incapable of cliché. I’m willing to bet Shteyman’s freshness is what left him open to absorbing, along the way, the completely unfamiliar GINK. Thanks to the nifty Dictionary widget,* I learned right away that, no, the correct answer for “Eccentric guys, slangily” is not GEEKS:

    gink |gi NG k|
    noun informal
    a foolish or contemptible person.
    ORIGIN early 20th cent.(originally U.S.): of unknown origin.

    *Oxford American Dictionaries, Apple OS 10.4 ("Tiger")

    Labels: crossword, language, new york times

    posted by DO at 3:10 PM 0 comments

    Monday, July 04, 2005

     

    Do as I Say, Not as I Do

    There are days when the need to finish the puzzle is so urgent that no distraction can get in the way. Last Thursday was one of those days. I headed with Times in hand toward the car for my bi-weekly, 90-minute stretch of peace and quiet....

    No! I can hear you shouting. Enough with the parking already!!!

    Bear with me. This time it’s different, I promise. Because when I got to the car, at 7:58am, there were orange cones lining my side of the street. Normally, signs will warn you days in advance if there will be a change in the parking rules. A film director had decided, apparently at the last minute, to shoot on my block. And so, instead of sitting and filling squares and waiting patiently for the street sweeper, I was forced to move Louie. What this means is that a rather serious conflict arose, since I had set this time aside for the crossword puzzle.

    While prowling the streets, it occurred to me that it is possible to work on a puzzle and look for a spot at the same time. It’s no doubt completely illegal. And counterproductive, too. Expert parking requires you to keep your eyes trained on the street ahead and watch for tell-tale signs that someone is getting ready to pull out—a parked car’s brake lights coming on, a person walking with keys in hand.

    The maneuver proceeded without incident and even helped to clarify why crosswords and parking are twin passions. They scratch the same itch. Both exist in black and white universes (literally so in the case of crosswords). Both are about rules: with crosswords, there is only one right answer; with parking, either you are parked legally or you are not. In both cases, you must come up with clever and ingenious ways of getting to your goal, and the possibilities for how to do that are infinite.

    If you do feel compelled to try this at home, learn from my mistake and don’t let the police see you steer with a pen in your hand.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 5:55 PM 2 comments

    Sunday, June 26, 2005

     

    No Joy in Puzzleville

    Socrates believed that education consists of extracting knowledge already inborn within all of us. This may be spiritual claptrap, but it’s a comforting sentiment and it feels nice to say it. And we get that same nice feeling whenever we are challenged by a difficult puzzle.

    The New York Times crossword is not only the most difficult puzzle in American newspapers, it is also the most joyful. Those two things go together. The idioms, the wit, the broad cultural literacy required to solve it—all of these elements combine to create an exhilarating Aha! experience. It comforts us because it reminds us of things we already know, things deep inside us we feel we’ve known since before we were born.

    The puzzle this past Friday was more difficult than usual. Under normal circumstances that would simply mean more time, greater focus, and, in the end, a more deeply satisfying experience. Something was different this time, though, and I wasn’t the only one to notice. A lunch companion asked, “Hey Dean, what was wrong with today’s puzzle?” The answer that jumped first to my lips: “It was joyless.”

    First, there was ETATIST. Who says that? The English word is “statist.” Then came FOSDICK. Fosdick? And then LIBERTYPOLE. Huh? These are words that I and everyone I know would never, ever use. I wondered if they were provided by some crossword compiling software. It seemed as if the puzzle was obscure for the sake of difficulty, rather than difficult for the sake of satisfaction. The whole affair was less Aha! and more Wha?

    I don’t intend to disparage the constructor. After all, contributors to the Times online forum expressed how happy they were with the challenge. And so I’m forced to come to unflattering conclusions about myself. Perhaps the joylessness of last Friday’s experience means that I have become one of those people who want to be reinforced in who they have been rather than to be stretched into becoming someone new. That’s the first sign of losing the battle of being alive. My hypothesis will be confirmed should I ever tune the radio to an oldies station.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 9:58 AM 6 comments

    Wednesday, June 22, 2005

     

    For New York Area Crossword Enthusiasts Who Also Like Art

    There is a terrific exhibition by artist Edwina White that you won't want to miss. It's at Gigantic Artspace on Franklin Street between Lafayette and Broadway. Click here for info. You'll have to hurry, because it closes Saturday. (I would have let you know sooner, but I just discovered it myself.)

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 7:27 PM 1 comments

    Sunday, June 19, 2005

     

    Quod Me Nutrit Me Destruit

    These are the words Angelina Jolie has tattooed below her navel. Translated from Latin, they mean: “That which nourishes me also destroys me.” Is this her way of signaling to the world that she, too, is addicted to crosswords?

    Google says no. This appears to be a favorite slogan of the eating disorder community. But I say we’re still kindred spirits. Because the language I use to describe why I do the puzzle is strikingly similar to theirs: it’s an aspect of my life that I can control. When chaos looms all around, I turn to the puzzle. Not only does it shut out the craziness, but I’m focused on a task I know I can master. It’s not about whether I’ll complete it, it’s about how much solace I can get out of immersing myself in it. I’ve often said that if there were a chance I could not finish the crossword, I wouldn’t do it.

    Yes, this is what I’ve often said—until yesterday, when I had to cheat to fill in the NE corner. In so doing, I became, for a day, one of those people for whom the puzzle is itself the source of anxiety, not its vanquisher. Knowing that many on the Times crossword forum struggled with the same clues provided little comfort. Actually, no comfort at all. That’s their business.

    Now I need to come up with a suitable place for that tattoo.

    Labels: crossword, quote

    posted by DO at 8:15 AM 8 comments

    Monday, June 06, 2005

     

    On Solving the Crossword With Someone Else

    I don’t think of myself as tentative, but my crossword solving habits have led at least one person to apply that epithet to me. It’s true that using a pen makes me more careful. That’s because a cleanly filled grid with no cross-outs is infinitely more satisfying than a quickly filled grid. Pencils, and the inevitable erasures that go along with them, bring ugliness into the universe.

    If I were forced at gunpoint to divide the world into two types of people, I would do it this way: there are those who solve crosswords in pencil, and those who use a pen. I suppose pencil and pen people could be allowed to work on puzzles together; however, that way madness lies. Pencil people, even when they use pens out of courtesy, approach the puzzle with a—dare I say it?—a certain recklessness. They've developed this habit because they think everything can be erased. Yes, pencils have erasers, but the mind does not.

    Take, for example, this past Saturday’s Times. Once RANTER was there (“One given to diatribes”), it was hard to see the grid with fresh eyes, so that SPEWER could take its place. And it was all I could do to keep from blurting out, “No! Don’t put in ANTHER!! Sure, it may be an ‘Iris part,’ but chances are they’re not talking about flowers, they mean the one in your eye!!!” Crossword etiquette demands keeping such impulses in check. Eventually, we changed the answer to AREOLE. Those potentially right but ultimately wrong answers seared themselves into our brains, keeping the NE and SW quadrants empty for a couple of hours, until finally we rebuilt from scratch.

    Don’t get me wrong. I’m the first to admit that my love of a neat, ink-filled grid is borderline OCD. I do think, though, that there is an argument to be made for keeping your options open—the mind, a tabula rasa—until certainty is achieved. I realize, too, that this line of reasoning is headed in a direction that will seem to contradict my previous statements against racing against the clock. Really, though, my complaint has less to do with speed solving and more to do with avoiding the wrong path, which equals unnecessarily lost time. If time does indeed equal money, then pen people rule.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 7:32 PM 3 comments

    Wednesday, June 01, 2005

     

    Cancer Schmancer

    There are very few things that keep me from going first to the puzzle every morning, which often happens at the expense of getting through the news. This morning, though, one of those things came along. It was the chance to read every detail the Times saw fit to print regarding the resolution of a decades-old mystery, one that had gone on for the large majority of my time on Earth. Woodstein confirmed it: “W. Mark Felt was Deep Throat.” What is a crossword puzzle other than a compact little mystery story played out on a 15x15 grid? Here was a mystery that had carried on for 15+15 years.

    But what sad details they were, having less to do with the family’s apparent desire to beat Bob Woodward to the profits (“Mr. Felt’s daughter, Joan, spoke of the money it might make to help pay tuition bills for her children”) and everything to do with Felt’s original motive to leak to Woodstein in the first place, which was not to cure the cancer on the presidency as we understood it. After all, Felt himself was convicted for authorizing illegal break-ins to investigate the Weather Underground. No, we're left to conclude that what we have here appears to be a case of spite and/or an attempt to punish the president for grabbing power from the FBI: “Mr. Felt spent more than 30 years at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a protégé of its legendary director, J. Edgar Hoover, and was bitterly disappointed after Hoover’s death in May 1972—a month before the Watergate break-in—that Nixon went outside the agency for a new chief.”

    It’s enough to drive one to the crossword puzzle.

    Labels: crossword, journalism, new york times, politics

    posted by DO at 11:32 AM 1 comments

    Saturday, May 28, 2005

     

    Everything I Know About Canada I Learned From Crossword Puzzles

    If the crossword is any indicator of the national character, then Canadians really are as concerned about manners as we suspected.

    26A “Unsympathetic”=CALLOUS
    44A “Polite word of request”=PLEASE

    Also, the answer REGAL has appeared twice in two days. That, along with the Queen’s presence at every financial transaction, makes me wonder if Canadians long for full reabsorption into the Empire.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 4:10 PM 0 comments

     

    A Canard on Toto

    We are definitely not in Kansas anymore. During my (long overdue) first visit ever to Toronto, I am tempted to conclude that I am still in the U.S., but someone has gone back in time and killed a dinosaur. Everything feels and looks more or less the same as back home, except for the electric streetcars on tracks, “washrooms,” and, believe it or not, PHONE BOOTHS, complete with multi-volume phone directories (intact) still hanging in binders.

    And then there are the puzzles. The Diversions page of the National Post captures Canada’s split psyche: a cryptic crossword nods to the Commonwealth, while the Canadian Crisscross is an “American” style puzzle. The only problem is that you have to be from here to finish it. The theme for Friday’s crisscross was Canadian sports figures. Through cross-checking, I figured out that the “Canadian who plays for the Royals” is MATT STAIRS. I had all but the second letter for “Canadian who played for the Dodgers.” GOODY ROSEN made the most sense, since anyone born with the name Grody would have changed it by now. I gather everyone who follows the Olympics (i.e., everyone but me) knows that “_____ Stojko (Canadian figure skater)” is ELVIS. This yielded an utterly alien answer, however, for “Ancient Greek oil flask”: OLPE. Olpe? Sure enough, Google confirms it is so. Can it be possible that Canada has its own crosswordese, distinct from ours down south? What an odd way to claim cultural distinctiveness.

    Today’s National Post featured an extraordinary treat: a cryptic by Emily Cox and Henry Rathvon. A taste of home, from the best constructors I know. I don’t recognize this particular puzzle of theirs, and I think I’ve done all the cryptics they’ve ever made. What makes it special is the degree to which it is governed by a theme. Their excellent acrostics for the New York Times are loaded with themed clues all the time, but I’ve never seen a cryptic (by them or anyone) in which practically every across clue has something to do with a single subject—in this case, various kinds of boats. Are they creating new work for Canada that doesn’t appear in the U.S.? I suppose it’s possible this puzzle will appear some day in the Times. Still, I can't shake this fantasy in which their cryptics appear every Saturday in the National Post (which doesn’t seem to put its crossword online, so I’m having a hard time confirming). If Cox and Rathvon are in fact weekly fixture here, that settles it: I am moving to Canada. It seems to me the most legitimate reason to expatriate, much more than seeking political asylum.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 11:31 AM 2 comments

    Friday, May 27, 2005

     

    Measure Twice, Cut Once

    This is more like it. I have no idea how long it took me to finish this morning’s puzzle. What I can say is that I could feel my heart rate … slow … down. Away from the pressure of a ticking clock, I entered into a state of free association, where options offered themselves for consideration. The non-starters politely walked away and the keepers sat down with confidence. Cross-checking answers before entering, like a good carpenter, makes for a neatly filled grid with no cross-outs, which is a thing of beauty and a joy forever.

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 10:17 PM 2 comments

    Wednesday, May 25, 2005

     

    On Solving the Crossword Without a Stopwatch

    That settles it. Racing against the clock truly ruins the experience.

    On Monday, I timed myself while solving the Times crossword, thinking it would be a good idea to start training now for the Stamford tournament next spring. I didn't even notice the theme, which was organized around the concept of twos.

    Today I decided to do the puzzle just for fun. And that's exactly what it was. Time slipped away. I entered my happy place. I developed a deep appreciation for the constructor, Nancy Salomon. The elegance of her mind set off fireworks in mine. The grid somehow seemed to engulf me, and I became attentive to the full pleasure of the experience in all its anatomy.

    I hear the cries of sour grapes already: because I don't stand a chance of ever winning at Stamford, therefore I've concocted an elaborate justification for why I should not try.

    Maybe. But the lyric that has earwormed its way into my head today is this: "I want a man with a slow hand."

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 1:13 PM 3 comments

    Friday, May 20, 2005

     

    I've Been Pejked

    I wish to propose a new word.

    Main Entry: pejk
    Pronuncation: 'pīk
    Function: verb
    transitive sense
    1 : to send someone searching for a thing that does not exist
    see SNIPE HUNT
    Etymology: Danish-American, from Next Big Thing producer Pejk Malinovski's reference to "a passage in The Unbearable Lightness of Being where Kundera talks about crossword puzzles."

    Catnip, really, to someone about to embark on a year-long investigation of the role crosswords play in our lives. Except, as far as I can tell, such a passage does not exist. After scanning every page of the book in question, and then doing it again, it occurred to me that perhaps Pejk was simply thinking of the wrong title. The thought of looking at every page written by Kundera seemed daunting, but doable.

    Then I remembered the Search Inside This Book function at amazon.com. Entering "crossword" into the search field yielded this response: No reference to crossword in this book. Same for:
    The Book of Laughter and Forgetting
    Immortality
    Ignorance
    Identity
    The Joke
    Life Is Elsewhere
    Laughable Loves
    Slowness
    Farewell Waltz
    Testaments Betrayed
    The Art of the Novel

    Am I forgetting any?
    If not Kundera, then who might it have been?

    [Thanks to Erin for the suggestion.]

    Labels: crossword

    posted by DO at 2:12 AM 2 comments

    About Me

    My Photo
    Name: Dean Olsher
    Location: Queens, NY

    Author of FROM SQUARE ONE: A MEDITATION, WITH DIGRESSIONS, ON CROSSWORDS - hardcover from Scribner and spoken-word adaptation (with rich sound design and original music) from Random House Audio.

    View my complete profile

    Click Here for Home Page

    Subscribe

    Click for Atom feed

    Loading

    Say Hi

  • Email Dean
  • Crosswords

  • Diary of a Crossword Fiend
  • Rex Parker Does the NYT Crossword Puzzle
  • Matt Gaffney's Weekly Crossword Contest
  • Wordplay: The Crossword Blog of The New York Times
  • Heaneyland!
  • Cruciverb
  • Puzzazz
  • Sound

  • BBC Radio 3 and Radio 4
  • Weird Vibrations (Ben Tausig)
  • The End of the Dial
  • NPR
  • The Next Big Thing archive
  • Third Coast Audio Festival
  • Ben Rubin/Ear Studio
  • Radio Diaries
  • Alex Ross/The Rest Is Noise
  • Transom
  • Radio Without Boundaries
  • LISSENUP
  • The Bad Plus/Do the Math
  • Et Alia

  • La Muse Writers' & Artists' Retreat
  • Henry Alford
  • The Genius in All of Us (David Shenk)
  • Romenesko
  • Yaddo
  • Maira Kalman
  • Indefensible
  • John Rosenthal
  • Previous Posts

      • We're on the Calendar, So That Means It's Happenin...
      • Marking the Occasion
      • Where Have I Been?
      • The Course of Empire
      • Read the Fine Print
      • How Ideology Works
      • Quote of the Day
      • Get It by Dec. 24 - 1 day left to order with Stand...
      • Liminal Suggestion #2
      • A Huge Loss

      Powered by Blogger