Archive for the ‘new york times’ Category

Thank You, Amy!

Posted on: November 17th, 2005 by admin 7 Comments

… for the most complete answer so far. Since Amy has declined the prize, it remains available. And what the hell, I’ll throw in my 2005 Edward Gorey calendar, too. I would, however, like to steer the conversation away from the question of how Will Shortz maintains the high quality of his puzzle and more in the direction of what exactly those qualities are. Answer #4 is starting to get at it. Those ineffable aspects I’m trying to grasp do include “the little humorous touches, tricky clues, and ‘aha’ moments,” but I think there’s more to it.

For example, I’ve felt the need more and more to distinguish between aha! moments and ah! moments. Ah! moments, I think, have less to do with light bulbs over the head and more to do with appreciation of little moments of beauty. Once, when I was a teenager, I was solving a puzzle with my mother, and when we cracked a tricky clue playing off a word’s double meaning, she sighed in awe, “Isn’t English an amazing language?” I had never thought about it that way before. Is English more amazing than other languages? What produces the ah! moment?

I also think it has something to do with the question of cultural references. For some reason—no doubt Will Shortz’s personal taste—the Times crossword speaks the same lingua franca as the countless (how many?) readers who are in it for the puzzle. Even the many clues, mostly sports-related, that mean nothing to me seem as if they ought to be there. The Times creates that feeling of reminding you of things you already know but just haven’t been foremost on your mind lately. Often, when doing puzzles in the Sun, which are nicely constructed and suitably challenging, I find myself wondering if I woke up in the wrong universe today.

It’s Come to This

Posted on: November 16th, 2005 by admin 2 Comments

From the Department of Lame Prizes, to the commenter who offers the most satisfying answer to the question “What qualities make the New York Times crossword puzzle superior to all the others?”: a 2006 MoMA members calendar, still shrink-wrapped and perfect for regifting.

Day Two of “America Held Hostage”

Posted on: November 15th, 2005 by admin 2 Comments

Rumor has it a press strike is keeping the Times from finding its rightful spot at Homer’s Variety (and the entire region, for that matter) two days in a row now. I am, of course, unable to verify this tip because I can’t buy the newspaper and there’s simply no other way to get the information. Can anyone out there tell me how else to find out?

No, don’t. That was just a little joke for the benefit of those who still believe I don’t have this whole internets thing figured out yet.

A helpful friend asks if doing the puzzle on newsprint is that much better than printing out the Across Lite file. [Note to those outside the tribe: Across Lite is the software that allows us to solve the crossword puzzle on a computer.] When I went on to explain that I have an irrational, costly, old-fashioned desire to possess the daily paper and complete the puzzle printed therein as God intended it, said friend came up with a truly brilliant solution: “Well, you could buy newsprint paper and print the puzzle on that and paste it over a puzzle in an old newspaper…”

One quibble with “Beer festival mo.”=OCT. What about the fact that Oktoberfest is actually held in September? (I’ve always believed this is a by-product of the conversion from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar, although that theory suddenly seems a little suspicious, because that same calendrical conversion is the reason why the October Revolution is now commemorated in November. October either becomes September or November, but you can’t have it both ways, can you? Since the adoption of the Gregorian calendar required losing 13 days, I’m beginning to think that means it really can’t have anything to do with why Germans get drunk a month earlier than they’re supposed to. Okay, folks, this adds yet another question to the mix: what is the real reason for premature Oktoberfest? The need for instant gratification?)

But really, the pressing question of the week remains unsatisfyingly answered: what qualities make the New York Times puzzle so superior? (Where’s Francis when you need him?) Don’t force me to resort to lame prizes. Here, let me prime the pump a little more. I think it has almost nothing to do with how hard they are, since the New York Sun puzzles are equally challenging, yet, to my taste, seem difficult for the sake of difficulty and tend to produce fewer Ah! experiences (as opposed to Aha! experiences).

The Next Best Thing Officially Goes Interactive. Have At It.

Posted on: November 14th, 2005 by admin 2 Comments

Morning routine: en route to favorite coffee place where they use the steamed milk to draw fern leaves right into your latte, stop off at Homer’s Variety to pick up—what, no Times?

Nice lady behind counter: “There’s only one distributor for the whole area. You’d have to go to Hartford to get one.”

Can she tell by looking at my face that I’m considering doing just that?

“It’s a Monday anyway. It’d be too easy.”

I know, but you don’t understand. Just because it’s too easy doesn’t exempt me from having to do it.

“You could go to the library and do it online.”

No, that’s the thing. I already pay the $34.95 per year for the online puzzle, even though I prefer to solve it on newsprint. For that luxury I pay a dollar a day Monday through Saturday, plus $3.50 on Sundays, so that’s—WHAT?—$494 a year just for the fucking Times puzzle? Let’s see what the Berkshire Eagle has to offer.

Oh right. This is why I shell out the dough.

To be honest, I haven’t done enough crosswords syndicated by the Chicago Tribune to know if today’s is a representative sample or not, but this was just so—perfunctory.

The single Ah! Moment (not to be confused with an Aha! moment) came with 43A: “Sink” or “swim” = VERB—although I’d like to think the Times would have had the courage to leave out the scare quotes.

It makes you realize that constructing a good puzzle requires a whole lot more than just saying, “Oh look, here is a collection of words that fit together.”

Which brings me to a question that has nagged me for a long time: just exactly what is it that makes the New York Times puzzle so superior? This is not a rhetorical question. I really want to know.

Let me get you started by saying what I think is a small part of the answer: it’s smart, it’s fresh, and often has what people in the biz call “lively fill.” But is that all it takes to make a crossword good? Let me also say that, for me, anyway, it’s rarely the theme that makes a puzzle satisfying. There’s usually something else going on. Something mysterious. Tell me what it is.

Now the Sun Will Rise as Brightly

Posted on: November 6th, 2005 by admin 10 Comments

One of my least endearing qualities is a lack of compassion for people who claim they are “unable” to solve crossword puzzles. Oh come on, I say, it’s not that you can’t do it, you’re just not in the habit. Solving crosswords is a skill that, with practice, anyone can develop, just like exercise. Start with Mondays, and soon you’ll be complaining that the same words keep reappearing and that the work-to-fun ratio in the Sunday Times crossword is not favorable enough to merit spending time on it. Eventually, if you have the proper predisposition to addictive behavior, you’ll become, well, like me: before the news can be read and thoughts can be had and the work of the day carried out, the puzzle must be solved.

As I do every Sunday, I opened the magazine from the back, bypassed the crossword at the top of the page and went directly to the diagramless below it. The wonderful thing about solving a diagramless puzzle is that it’s like parachuting into the desert without a compass and finding your way home, all at your kitchen table. It requires an inner sense of where you are, the mental equivalent of Bill Bradley’s ability to stand in the middle of the court and throw the basketball over his shoulder into the net behind him. Without looking. The diagramless, as the name implies, is a crossword with the black squares removed, thus leaving you on your own to figure out where to put them in. To make up for this added challenge, the clues are generally easier than they would be in a standard crossword. Once you get the hang of it, it can be a rather routine affair, but there is an elegant beauty in the way the answers ooze like blood from a stab wound, starting in the upper left corner and proceeding to the lower right. Every six weeks or so when the diagramless appears, I employ this same process so that I may begin my day.

Today almost didn’t begin.

1-Across: “Male turkeys.” I knew the answer would be four letters long, since the next clue was 5-Across. And that’s all I knew. For the life of me, I could not conjure up the answer. Male turkeys? Uh. Coqs? No. Under normal circumstances, filling in the downs would have solved the problem, but these were all stumpers. Was it possible that this puzzle, and therefore the whole day itself, would be stopped before it began? Because, given the aforementioned process I’ve followed year after year, without 1-Across, I wouldn’t be able to progress to the rest of the puzzle.

After an hour or so of fidgeting and pacing and staring off into space, I suppose a normal person would have Googled, just to get the damn thing going. For some reason, though—and I don’t think it has anything to do with morality (although now that I reconsider, it might)—I won’t consult outside sources. Not that there’s anything wrong with people who do. That’s an individual choice they make for themselves. It’s just not for me. The problem is that it’s so difficult to know what you don’t know. It’s a matter of figuring out whether a.) you simply don’t know the answer, in which case checking a reference work might be permitted, or b.) the answer is in your brain but it’s just hidden under a pile of papers. Since the answer is almost the latter, then no looking up.

Panic took over. I had things to do! Plus, I’m too young to go senile. Are those head injuries are starting to catch up with me? Is the government lying about mad cow disease in the food supply? Have I become one of those people with whom I have so consistently failed to empathize?

Look at a problem head-on long enough and you fail. Turn your attention to the side, say, to a long, rambling phone conversation that still allows you enough CPU space for the unresolved problem at hand, and you stand a chance of hearing that teeny voice whispering from the medulla oblongata: “Dean, dear, you have become a rat in a Skinner box. Years of routine have inured you to the thrill of the challenge, the very thing that attracted you to these puzzles in the first place. Who says you have to start at 1-Across? Since the whole purpose of these diagramless crosswords is to navigate without a map, then get off your ass and start doing that. Start somewhere else in the puzzle, and then solve backwards to the beginning.”

I thanked the voice, it muttered something that sounded like “dumbass,” and off I went. Within minutes, I wrote in T-O-M-S.

And thus the day began. Just in time for dinner.

This Is My Grandfather’s Oldsmobile

Posted on: October 7th, 2005 by admin 4 Comments

There is a rupture in the space-time continuum located precisely where the K-Mart stands in Great Barrington, Massachusetts. No matter what the calendar says, in that spot the year is always 1982. Anyone who enters is guaranteed to hear at least one song by Christopher Cross.

I have discovered another entry point into that time warp: today’s Times crossword, which featured these hits from an even earlier yesteryear (several yesteryears, in fact):

Parlor pieces = DIVANS

Citrus-y drink = TOM COLLINS

Nonconformists = BEATNIKS

Bunk = APPLESAUCE (a double whammy, as both clue AND answer are long extinct)

Emphatic negative = NOSIREEBOB

Awesome = RAD (a noble effort at keeping up with the youth of today 1982)

There’s an important lesson to be learned here: maintaining a competitive edge in generational warfare requires more than just knowing what’s new and hip (or, in the universe of this puzzle, hep). When it comes to crosswords, this war is fought on two fronts.

Commas Gone Wild

Posted on: September 22nd, 2005 by admin 9 Comments

Signs of the Times?

“The official, said the question was not ‘if it will be published, but when,’ referring to the new ruling about homosexuality in Catholic seminaries, a topic that has stirred much recent rumor and worry in the church.” [A1]

And then this: “The images coming out of this impoverished, West African nation have been unrelentingly grim….” [A3]

I suppose you could make a case on behalf of this second one, but it would be a stretch.

THE TIMES, CONSISTENTLY FAILING TO SPOT THE BEST QUOTATION OF THE DAY

Posted on: September 12th, 2005 by admin No Comments

“GEORGE Bush hates midgets.”

CHRIS ROCK, on Friday’s “Shelter From the Storm” telethon for Katrina relief. [E7]

“Sculpture” as a Verb?

Posted on: September 5th, 2005 by admin 11 Comments

Ick.

Next thing you know, they’ll start using “pleasure” as a verb, too.

(Oh, right….)

Unacceptable Indeed

Posted on: September 3rd, 2005 by admin 6 Comments

The plan was to tackle a particularly smart-looking puzzle, a crossword with a fresh twist in Friday’s New York Sun, which has been giving that other newspaper a run for its money lately. I was especially looking forward to it because it was by a constructor who once made a puzzle I had criticized, and here was an opportunity to follow up with praise for breathing life into an exercise that, over at the Times, can suffer from an inexorable sameness day after day.

The plan was aborted. For the time being, anyway. I’ll come back to it at some point in the future, when focusing so much attention on a puzzle feels like the right thing to do. Time spent deep in Puzzleland, not bearing witness to the dead and the grieving, seems somehow disrespectful.

Puzzleland, for those of us without developed spiritual practices who still need to cultivate a place in the mind apart from this world of betrayal and suffering, is the next best thing. In Puzzleland, there is no cancer, no hypocrisy, no government malfeasance. It is a clean and quiet virtual space where, instead of focusing on a single word, like om (which is out of the question anyway because it’s only two letters long), you open your thoughts to all the words in your memory. Laser-honed concentration silences hatred, injustice, and the voices that tell you you’re not good enough. And so, for a few moments every day, I acknowledge the many things in this world that I cannot change and make a trip to Puzzleland.

Except for weeks like this one. Puzzleland is for garden-variety, everyday crimes and misdemeanors. The enormity of the wrongdoing this time around, resulting in the unnecessary loss of so many human lives and of an irreplaceable cultural patrimony, renders acceptance unacceptable. All human suffering is deplorable. But when it is so preventable, and when it so directly correlates to the actions of a government that consistently looks the other way, acceptance seems treasonous.

I marvel how many times the American public accepts this same pattern as it is repeated again and again. After almost three thousand died in New York, while our leaders were looking the other way. And after even more innocent lives were lost in Iraq, allowing Osama bin Laden to escape capture while, once again, our leaders looked the other way. In parliamentary democracies, after such large-magnitude blunders, the government resigns in disgrace. It was nearly impossible to know what to say when the voters of this country, instead of demanding that Congress impeach the president for waging war under false pretenses, rewarded him with a second term of office.

What’s a person of conscience to do? It is too late to spend the money on shoring up the levees. The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and that blood stains the hands of the administration that stopped paying for the efforts that might have prevented the annihilation of New Orleans while spending more and more on the debacle in Iraq instead. And while we as individuals send money for relief, we can’t help but worry whether those in charge have the competence to administer it.

The precedent that was set in California seems more attractive by the day. But even a recall at the federal level would take too long. This president, who claims to cherish human life, seems hell-bent on destroying it at every opportunity. We must stop him before he kills again. I love America and I want its citizens to enjoy their right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The best thing we can do for the future of our country is to call upon the administration to step aside and make room for someone capable of doing the job.